Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.11.07.22281786

ABSTRACT

Background and aims Immunocompromised patients have a reduced ability to generate antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination and are at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, complications and mortality. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a monoclonal antibody combination which bind to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, preventing the virus entering human cells. The phase III PROVENT trial reported that immunocompromised patients given Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab had a significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 infection. However, PROVENT was conducted before the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron became prevalent. This systematic review provides an updated summary of real-world clinical evidence of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab effectiveness in immunocompromised patients. Methods Two independent reviewers conducted PubMed and medRxiv searches for the period of 01/01/2021 to 01/10/2022. Clinical studies which reported the primary outcome of breakthrough COVID-19 infections after Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab administration were included in the review. COVID-19-related hospitalisations, ITU admissions and mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. Clinical effectiveness was determined using the case-control clinical effectiveness methodology. The GRADE tool was used to ascertain the level of certainty for the primary outcome in each study. Results 17 clinical studies were included, comprising 24,773 immunocompromised participants of whom 10,775 received Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab. Most studies reported clinical outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave. Six studies compared a Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab intervention group to a control group. Overall, the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab against COVID-19 breakthrough infection, hospitalisation and ITU admission were 40.47%, 69.23% and 87.89%, respectively. For prevention of all-cause and COVID-19-specifc mortality, overall clinical effectiveness was 81.29% and 86.36%, respectively. Conclusions There is a growing body of real-world evidence validating the original PROVENT phase III study regarding the clinical effectiveness of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as prophylaxis for immunocompromised patients, notably demonstrating effectiveness during the Omicron wave. This review demonstrates the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab at reducing COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, ITU admission and mortality for immunosuppressed individuals. It is important that ongoing larger-scale and better-controlled real world studies are initiated and evaluated to provide ongoing certainty of the clinical benefit of prophylactic antibody treatment for immunocompromised patients in the face of new variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Breakthrough Pain
2.
Francesco Marchesi; Jon Salmanton-Garcia; Ziad EMARAH; Klára PIUKOVICS; Marcio Nucci; Alberto Lopez-Garcia; Zdenek Racil; Francesca Farina; Marina POPOVA; Sofia ZOMPI; Ernesta Audisio; Marie-Pierre Ledoux; Luisa VERGA; Barbora Weinbergerova; Tomas Szotkowski; Maria Silva; Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla; Nick DE JONGE; Graham Collins; Monia Marchetti; Gabriele MAGLIANO; Carolina GARCÍA-VIDAL; Monika M. BIERNAT; Jaap van Doesum; Marina MACHADO; Fatih Demirkan; Murtadha Al Khabori; Pavel Zak; Benjamin Visek; Igor STOMA; Gustavo-Adolfo MÉNDEZ; Johan Maertens; Nina KHANNA; Ildefonso Espigado; Giulia DRAGONETTI; Luana Fianchi; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Alba CABIRTA; Irati ORMAZABAL-VÉLEZ; Ozren Jaksic; Caterina BUQUICCHIO; Valentina BONUOMO; Josip Batinić; Ali S. OMRANI; Sylvain Lamure; Olimpia Finizio; Noemí FERNÁNDEZ; Iker FALCES-ROMERO; Ola BLENNOW; Rui BERGANTIM; Natasha Ali; Sein WIN; Jens VAN PRAET; Maria Chiara Tisi; Ayten SHIRINOVA; Martin SCHÖNLEIN; Juergen PRATTES; Monica PIEDIMONTE; Verena Petzer; Milan NAVRÁTIL; Austin Kulasekararaj; Pavel Jindra; Jiří SRAMEK; Andreas Glenthøj; Rita FAZZI; Cristina de Ramón; Chiara Cattaneo; Maria CALBACHO; Nathan C. BAHR; Shaimaa Saber EL-ASHWL; Raúl Córdoba; Michaela HANAKOVA; Giovanni ZAMBROTTA; Mariarita Sciumè; Stephen Booth; Raquel NUNES-RODRIGUES; Maria Vittoria SACCHI; Nicole GARCÍA-POUTÓN; Juan-Alberto MARTÍN-GONZÁLEZ; Sofya KHOSTELIDI; Stefanie GRÄFE; Laman RAHIMLI; alessandro busca; Paolo Corradini; Martin HOENIGL; Nikolai KLIMKO; Philipp Koehler; Antonio PAGLIUCA; Francesco Passamonti; Oliver Cornely; Livio pagano.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1323457.v1

ABSTRACT

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk of mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The optimal management of AML patients with COVID-19 has not been established. Our multicenter study included 388 adult AML patients with COVID-19 diagnosis between February 2020 and October 2021. The vast majority were receiving or had received AML treatment in the prior 3 months. COVID-19 was severe in 41.2% and critical in 21.1% of cases. The chemotherapeutic schedule was modified in 174 patients (44.8%), delayed in 68 and permanently discontinued in 106. After a median follow-up of 325 days, 180 patients (46.4%) had died. Death was attributed to COVID-19 (43.3%), AML (26.1%) or to a combination of both (26.7%). Active disease, older age, and treatment discontinuation were associated with death, whereas AML treatment delay was protective. Seventy-nine patients had a simultaneous AML and COVID-19 diagnosis, with an improved survival when AML treatment could be delayed. Patients with COVID-19 diagnosis between January and August 2020 had a significantly lower survival. COVID-19 in AML patients was associated with a high mortality rate and modifications of therapeutic algorithms. The best approach to improve survival was to delay AML treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL